Financial institutions are leaving critical vulnerabilities exposed in their operational resilience strategies, according to Wayne Scott, Global Regulatory Compliance Lead at Escode, speaking on FinextraTV. While firms focus on software protection, they’re neglecting three major risk categories: supply chain failure, service deterioration, and concentration risk.
Scott challenged the industry’s “too big to fail” assumption, warning that many institutions are actually “too big to save” in crisis scenarios. He highlighted stark differences in global regulatory approaches across the UK, India, Saudi Arabia, US, and Switzerland, adding complexity for international operations. The increasing regulatory divergence means firms can’t rely on one-size-fits-all resilience frameworks.
Scott emphasized that escrow solutions remain underutilized despite proving effective at reducing third-party vendor exposure and protecting against service continuity failures. As operational resilience regulations tighten globally, firms risk compliance gaps and systemic vulnerabilities.
**
FXnCO Insight
** Financial firms should immediately audit their resilience strategies for supply chain, service quality, and concentration exposures, particularly reviewing escrow protection for critical third-party systems before regulatory enforcement intensifies.
Source: Finextra